<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Yahoo and MSN Agree on the Canonical Link Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/</link>
	<description>not just another e-marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=Updated</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flush</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Flush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-762</guid>
		<description>First off I just recently did a 301 redirect, it was the biggest mistake I have ever made. It takes months regain just a portion of the links our old site had. Second it sounds like its a universal nofollow tag. Supposedly no follow tags are only applicable to google and not all the major search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off I just recently did a 301 redirect, it was the biggest mistake I have ever made. It takes months regain just a portion of the links our old site had. Second it sounds like its a universal nofollow tag. Supposedly no follow tags are only applicable to google and not all the major search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark8t Staff</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark8t Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is the point. More info from Google:

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is the point. More info from Google:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=66359" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=66359</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-654</guid>
		<description>So is this a possible way to keep your site from being hit with duplicate content if it is going to treat the page the same as your others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is this a possible way to keep your site from being hit with duplicate content if it is going to treat the page the same as your others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goran</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Goran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Fantastic, this sorts out an issue that we have while having various different resource catalogues on our website. Will look at how we can implement this. I see a few of the posters say there are issues but we will need to try it out for ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic, this sorts out an issue that we have while having various different resource catalogues on our website. Will look at how we can implement this. I see a few of the posters say there are issues but we will need to try it out for ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Duplicate content from tags, categories and such has always been a concern for me.  Most of the popular Wordpress themes caused you to end up having some pages indexed with the tag version while others went straight to the post or category.

This should help clean all that duplcate content up and allow us to produce better SEO blogs and websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duplicate content from tags, categories and such has always been a concern for me.  Most of the popular Wordpress themes caused you to end up having some pages indexed with the tag version while others went straight to the post or category.</p>
<p>This should help clean all that duplcate content up and allow us to produce better SEO blogs and websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigars</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Magento is overrated if you ask me. I&#039;ve seen it in action and it does suffer from duplicate content sometimes as well as other various issues.  

As far as having the canonical link I guess it would be helpful if you want to specify a particular link to google, but google tends to find the best content and display it.  I don&#039;t mess with what google does on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magento is overrated if you ask me. I&#8217;ve seen it in action and it does suffer from duplicate content sometimes as well as other various issues.  </p>
<p>As far as having the canonical link I guess it would be helpful if you want to specify a particular link to google, but google tends to find the best content and display it.  I don&#8217;t mess with what google does on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steam Shower</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Steam Shower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Does the Magento canonical plugin come standard or you have to manually add it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the Magento canonical plugin come standard or you have to manually add it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gurney</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gurney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-400</guid>
		<description>This canonical attribute is really useful for my art shop, which is developed through magento. Magento shops suffer from duplicate content issues sometimes, but there is now a canonical plugin which helps to avoid this issue. Thanks for the thorough explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This canonical attribute is really useful for my art shop, which is developed through magento. Magento shops suffer from duplicate content issues sometimes, but there is now a canonical plugin which helps to avoid this issue. Thanks for the thorough explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo! Backlinks and More From Site Explorer &#124; Mark8t: SEO, E-Marketing And More</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo! Backlinks and More From Site Explorer &#124; Mark8t: SEO, E-Marketing And More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] they’ll then automatically rewrite accordingly. This feature is similar to the new concept of the Canonical Link Tag, which Yahoo! also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they’ll then automatically rewrite accordingly. This feature is similar to the new concept of the Canonical Link Tag, which Yahoo! also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark8t Staff</title>
		<link>http://www.mark8t.com/2009/02/15/google-yahoo-and-msn-agree-on-the-canonical-link-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark8t Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mark8t.com/?p=901#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I guess because a tag is just a tag, but an attribute means there is a specification which  defines it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess because a tag is just a tag, but an attribute means there is a specification which  defines it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
